### Blog

##### 3D FEMDEM Simulations
Posted by

We have been working on a prototype of three-dimensional FEMDEM. We’ve implemented most of the critical features into the code, including a quasi-static friction law, Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, and transversely isotropic elastic constitutive law.

We’re excited to showcase some of the simulations results here. The figure below shows the simulation of a uniaxial compression test representing a mine pillar. The model is capable of capturing the progressive damage of the rock from isolated fractures that coalesce to form macroscopic fractures. The overall strength of the rock closely matches laboratory results.

X-ray style 3D fracture volume evolution of the rock is also shown below for an unconfined uniaxial simulation (σ3=0) and a confined triaxial test (σ23=2.5 MPa). The grey-scale intensity in the images represents fracture density (i.e., higher density corresponds to more localized fractures). As shown in the top section of the figure, the fractures form a major plane of failure at about 52°, which corresponds well with the theoretical Mohr-Coulomb value (45° + 0.5 * friction angle). As the bottom section shows, the addition of a small confining pressure (σ3=2.5 MPa) localizes the fractures further into a shear band.

More 3D results will be showcased in following blog posts.

##### Modelling approaches for layered rocks
Posted by

###### Mechanical anisotropy: sources and implications

The mechanical behaviour of several rocks, such as schists, sandstones, shales and basalts, is characterized by strong stiffness and strength anisotropy . This anisotropy may arise at different spatial scales within the rock:

• mineral scale: laminated material micro-structure;
• centimetre scale: schistosity, foliation, and bedding planes;
• rock mass scale: presence of preferably oriented physical discontinuities (e.g., joints, tectonic structures).

Most anisotropic rocks are best described as transversely isotropic bodies. That is, the deformability of these materials show isotropic properties within a plane that is normal to an axis of rotational symmetry.

From a practical point of view, the mechanical anisotropy directly affects the stability of underground excavations and observed failure behaviour. In particular, the reduced strength properties of the interfaces between layers may result in enhanced instabilities with failure patterns far more extensive than those observed under isotropic material conditions.
###### Numerical models

Numerical modelling can be used to analyse the stability of structures in layered rock formations. The simulation approaches are generally classified according to the type of material representation, as

• Equivalent continuum methods: the presence of layers is smeared to produce a fictitious continuous material that exhibits mechanical characteristics that are similar to the original discontinuous medium. Examples: ubiquitous joint models, Cosserat-theory models, statistical damage models.
• Discrete element methods (DEMs): layers or joints are explicitly included into the numerical model, which represents the medium as an assembly of blocks or particles with interaction laws governing the emergent behaviour of the rock. Examples: Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (DDA) method, bonded-particle models, Distinct Element codes.
###### FEMDEM

A third category is represented by the hybrid finite-discrete element method (FEMDEM). With this approach, the elastic deformation of the material is described using continuum mechanics theory while DEM algorithms and non-linear fracture mechanics principles are employed to capture material failure. With Geomechanica’s FEMDEM code, the anisotropy of stiffness is captured at the triangular element level using a stress-strain constitutive law for linearly elastic, transversely isotropic solids. On the other hand, the anisotropy of strength can be simulated by

• the “discrete” approach: a distribution of finite-sized, cohesion-less fractures aligned with the plane of isotropy is introduced into the model:
• the “smeared” approach: the cohesive strength parameters of the fracture model are varied as function of the relative orientation between the element bonds and the layering orientation:

In the next post, we will discuss the applicability of these two techniques to the simulation of damage development around deep excavations in shales.